These compounds are common formulations which provide comparative information on the wear properties of this resin and various combinations of additives.
Instead of off-the-shelf solutions, RTP Company routinely develops specialty compounds with a precise combination of properties such as conductivity, flame retardance, structural reinforcement, color, and wear resistance to meet your exact application requirements.
RTP 200 SI 2
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
639 |
0.54 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
181 |
0.78 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
85 |
0.77 |
versus RTP 200 SI 2
|
| 500 |
2 |
50 |
408 |
0.41 |
| 1000 |
4 |
50 |
303 |
0.15 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
3590 |
0.09 |
versus RTP 800 TFE 4 SI 2
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
36 |
0.27 |
versus RTP 899 X 82676 F
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
35 |
0.20 |
RTP 200 TFE 5
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
957 |
0.61 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
427 |
0.77 |
| 10000 |
20 |
100 |
76 |
0.59 |
RTP 200 TFE 10
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
437 |
0.42 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
591 |
0.52 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
274 |
0.39 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
63 |
0.31 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
151 |
0.25 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
339 |
0.52 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
154 |
0.43 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
19 |
0.28 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
156 |
0.29 |
| 10000 |
20 |
100 |
33 |
0.28 |
| 10000 |
20 |
100 |
33 |
0.28 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
276 |
0.38 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
48 |
0.35 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
59 |
0.35 |
versus RTP 200 TFE 10
|
| 500 |
2 |
50 |
448 |
0.33 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
98 |
0.23 |
RTP 200 TFE 10 SI 2
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 500 |
4 |
25 |
72 |
0.14 |
| 500 |
2 |
50 |
31 |
0.20 |
| 500 |
1 |
100 |
118 |
0.24 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
222 |
0.25 |
RTP 200 TFE 20
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
143 |
0.32 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
61 |
0.23 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
66 |
0.35 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
45 |
0.35 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
11 |
0.18 |
versus RTP 200 TFE 20
|
| 500 |
4 |
25 |
77 |
0.60 |
| 500 |
1 |
100 |
73 |
0.23 |
| 1000 |
4 |
50 |
82 |
0.13 |
| 2000 |
16 |
25 |
11 |
0.12 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
220 |
0.42 |
RTP 200 TFE 18 SI 2
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
11 |
0.20 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
245 |
0.33 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
254 |
0.33 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
59 |
0.36 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
18 |
0.19 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
752 |
0.07 |
versus RTP 200 TFE 18 SI 2
|
| 500 |
4 |
25 |
29 |
0.18 |
| 500 |
2 |
50 |
39 |
0.20 |
| 500 |
1 |
100 |
39 |
0.08 |
| 1000 |
4 |
50 |
12 |
0.16 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
64 |
0.02 |
RTP 202 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
213 |
0.44 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
37 |
0.50 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
229 |
0.27 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
131 |
0.34 |
versus RTP 202 TFE 15
|
| 500 |
2 |
50 |
11 |
0.26 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
97 |
0.07 |
RTP 202 TFE 13 SI 2
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
8 |
0.44 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
15 |
0.50 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
6 |
0.27 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
12 |
0.34 |
versus RTP 202 TFE 13 SI 2
|
| 500 |
2 |
50 |
9 |
0.12 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
31 |
0.14 |
RTP 205 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
42 |
0.50 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
51 |
0.42 |
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
66 |
0.50 |
| 5000 |
20 |
50 |
47 |
0.53 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
99 |
0.77 |
| 5000 |
5 |
200 |
153 |
0.42 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
130 |
0.42 |
| 10000 |
20 |
100 |
175 |
0.46 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
272 |
0.52 |
RTP 282 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
44 |
0.23 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
26 |
0.18 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
83 |
0.27 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
21 |
|
versus RTP 282 TFE 15
|
| 500 |
2 |
50 |
332 |
0.52 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
4 |
0.40 |
RTP 282 TFE 13 SI 2
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
176 |
0.25 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
69 |
0.31 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
112 |
0.55 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
192 |
0.70 |
versus RTP 282 TFE 13 SI 2
|
| 500 |
2 |
50 |
62 |
0.08 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
113 |
0.22 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
1200 |
0.25 |
RTP 285 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
36 |
0.35 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
38 |
0.35 |
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
60 |
0.31 |
| 5000 |
20 |
50 |
75 |
0.34 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
53 |
0.31 |
| 5000 |
5 |
200 |
67 |
0.28 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
84 |
0.59 |
| 10000 |
20 |
100 |
109 |
0.74 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
94 |
0.64 |
RTP 200 AR 15 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
112 |
0.39 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
122 |
0.44 |
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
28 |
0.57 |
| 5000 |
20 |
50 |
54 |
0.38 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
32 |
0.44 |
| 5000 |
5 |
200 |
44 |
0.60 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
148 |
0.39 |
| 10000 |
20 |
100 |
24 |
0.37 |
| 1000 |
10 |
200 |
34 |
0.37 |
RTP 299 X 83820 B
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
1180 |
0.39 |
RTP 299 X 83820 C
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
586 |
0.31 |
versus RTP 800 TFE 4 SI 1
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
8 |
0.28 |
versus RTP 899 X 82676 F
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
22 |
0.18 |
Data obtained using ASTM 3702.
PV units: lb ft/in2 min
Load units: lb
Speed units: ft/min
Wear Factor units: in3 min/lb/ft/hr
Data last revised: April 2001
|
RTP 200 Series Nylon 6/6 Compounds
Advantages
Strength
Stiffness
Heat resistance
Chemical resistance to hydrocarbons
Wear resistance and lubricity
Limitations
Poor chemical resistance to strong acids and bases
High water absorption
There are many types of nylons commercially available. The versatility of nylon makes it one of the most widely used engineering thermoplastics. Commercial nylons include nylon 6, nylon 4/6, nylon 6/6, nylon 6/10, nylon 6/12, nylon 11 and nylon 12. The numerical nomenclature for nylon is derived from the number of carbon atoms in the diamine and dibasic acid monomers used to manufacture it. The ratio of carbon atoms is what gives each nylon type its unique property characteristics.
Nylon 6/6 is one of the most versatile engineering thermoplastics. It is popular in every major market using thermoplastic materials. Because of its excellent balance of strength, ductility and heat resistance, nylon 6/6 is an outstanding candidate for metal replacement applications. nylon 6/6 is very easy to process with a very wide process window. This allows it to be used for everything from complex, thin walled components to large thick walled housings.
Nylon 6/6 is very easy to modify with fillers, fibers, internal lubricants, and impact modifiers. With the use of fiber reinforcements, the physical strength of nylon 6/6 can be improved five times that of the base resin. The stiffness of nylon 6/6 can be improved up to 10 times. With impact modifiers, the ductility of nylon 6/6 is comparable to polycarbonate. The use of internal lubricants improves on the already excellent wear resistance and friction properties on nylon 6/6. Its versatility allows it to be used in almost any application that requires high physical strength, ductility, heat resistance and chemical resistance.
|
|
|