These compounds are common formulations which provide comparative information on the wear properties of this resin and various combinations of additives.
Instead of off-the-shelf solutions, RTP Company routinely develops specialty compounds with a precise combination of properties such as conductivity, flame retardance, structural reinforcement, color, and wear resistance to meet your exact application requirements.
RTP 300 TFE 5
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
2800 |
0.29 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
683 |
0.33 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
467 |
0.42 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
192 |
0.26 |
versus RTP 300 TFE 5
|
| 500 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
0.17 |
| 1000 |
4 |
50 |
318 |
0.24 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
159 |
0.24 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
76 |
0.18 |
RTP 300 TFE 10
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
683 |
0.16 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
326 |
0.24 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
413 |
0.22 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
126 |
0.13 |
versus RTP 300 TFE 10
|
| 500 |
4 |
25 |
11 |
0.19 |
| 1000 |
4 |
50 |
36 |
0.17 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
145 |
0.18 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
93 |
0.11 |
RTP 300 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
387 |
0.56 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
131 |
0.33 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
95 |
0.27 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
34 |
0.21 |
versus RTP 300 TFE 15
|
| 500 |
4 |
25 |
8 |
0.30 |
| 1000 |
4 |
50 |
25 |
0.19 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
83 |
0.12 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
64 |
0.16 |
RTP 300 TFE 20
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
276 |
0.33 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
176 |
0.31 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
126 |
0.24 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
58 |
0.18 |
RTP 300 TFE 10 SI 2
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
639 |
0.31 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
495 |
0.35 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
162 |
0.26 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
58 |
0.18 |
RTP 300 AR 10
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
29 |
0.22 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
490 |
0.38 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
6020 |
0.29 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
7330 |
0.31 |
RTP 300 AR 10 TFE 10
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
330 |
0.03 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
56 |
0.10 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
88 |
0.14 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
138 |
0.14 |
RTP 302 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
47 |
0.22 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
55 |
0.35 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
964 |
0.34 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
316 |
0.34 |
RTP 305 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
98 |
0.31 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
88 |
0.35 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
46 |
0.53 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
501 |
0.27 |
RTP 382 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
36 |
0.57 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
22 |
0.54 |
versus RTP 382 TFE 15
|
| 500 |
4 |
25 |
98 |
0.31 |
| 1000 |
4 |
50 |
84 |
0.22 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
45 |
0.12 |
| 2000 |
4 |
100 |
56 |
0.13 |
RTP 385 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
20 |
0.24 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
142 |
0.30 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
102 |
0.39 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
36 |
0.36 |
Data obtained using ASTM 3702.
PV units: lb ft/in2 min
Load units: lb
Speed units: ft/min
Wear Factor units: in3 min/lb/ft/hr
Data last revised: April 2001
|
RTP 300 Series Polycarbonate Compounds
Advantages
Creep resistance
Toughness
Dimensional stability
Limitations
Poor chemical resistance
Processing difficulties
Low fatigue endurance
Polycarbonate possesses excellent impact strength, high heat resistance and good dimensional stability. It was one of the first thermoplastics to offer these properties. Although it is stable to water, mineral and organic acids, it is partially soluble in aromatic hydrocarbons, soluble in the chlorinated ones, and decomposes in strongly alkaline substances. It has good electrical properties.
The strength and dimensional stability of polycarbonates are further enhanced with fibrous glass reinforcement.
Reinforcement with 40% glass reduces the thermal expansion to 1.0 in/in/degrees F x 10E-5 (1.8 cm/cm/degrees C x 10E-5), which is below that of most thermoplastics and some metals. The tensile modulus is increased fivefold. Flexural, tensile and compressive strengths are doubled. Mold shrinkage is reduced, making it possible to produce very precise parts.
|
|
|