Instead of off-the-shelf solutions, RTP Company routinely develops specialty compounds with a precise combination of properties such as conductivity, flame retardance, structural reinforcement, color, and wear resistance to meet your exact application requirements.
ESD 800
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
43 |
0.6 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
19 |
0.57 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
3 |
0.44 |
RTP 800
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
93 |
0.4 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
102 |
0.42 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
150 |
0.44 |
RTP 800 SI 2
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
42 |
0.43 |
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
156 |
0.39 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
46 |
0.41 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
0.51 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
75 |
0.51 |
RTP 800 TFE 5
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
18 |
0.37 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
42 |
0.35 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
16 |
0.3 |
RTP 800 TFE 10
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
85 |
0.68 |
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
189 |
0.92 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
13 |
0.29 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
7 |
0.18 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
619 |
0.1 |
RTP 800 TFE 10 SI 2
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
9 |
0.29 |
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
57 |
0.63 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
6 |
0.24 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
9 |
0.14 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
109 |
0.27 |
versus RTP 300 TFE 10 SI 2
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
4 |
0.19 |
versus RTP 302 TFE 15
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
11 |
0.31 |
versus RTP 382 TFE 15
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
143 |
0.33 |
versus RTP 200 TFE 15
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
2 |
0.21 |
versus RTP 202 TFE 13 SI 2
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
3 |
0.21 |
versus RTP 282 TFE 13 SI 2
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
32 |
0.27 |
RTP 800 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
67 |
0.26 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
22 |
0.34 |
| 10000 |
10 |
100 |
92 |
0.39 |
RTP 800 TFE 20
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
82 |
0.25 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
14 |
0.34 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
40 |
0.39 |
RTP 800 TFE 20 DEL
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
40 |
10 |
115 |
0.17 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
83 |
0.22 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
57 |
0.27 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
116 |
0.28 |
RTP 882 TFE 10
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
160 |
0.3 |
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
219 |
0.4 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
303 |
0.57 |
RTP 800 AR 10 TFE 15
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
39 |
0.18 |
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
14 |
0.18 |
| 2000 |
2 |
200 |
16 |
|
| 5000 |
10 |
100 |
8 |
0.25 |
| 10000 |
40 |
50 |
3 |
0.19 |
| 10000 |
10 |
200 |
13 |
0.26 |
versus RTP 300 TFE 10 SI 2
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
4 |
0.24 |
versus RTP 302 TFE 15
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
18 |
0.22 |
versus RTP 382 TFE 15
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
25 |
0.22 |
versus RTP 200 TFE 15
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
6 |
0.23 |
versus RTP 202 TFE 13 SI 2
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
7 |
0.15 |
versus RTP 282 TFE 13 SI 2
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
25 |
0.3 |
RTP 899 X 82676 F
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
30 |
0.3 |
RTP 899 X 85698 A
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
11 |
0.36 |
RTP 899 X 88188
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
13 |
0.34 |
RTP 899 X 90822
versus 1018 C Steel
|
|
|
PV
|
Load
|
Speed
|
Wear Factor X 10E-10
|
µ dynamic
|
| 2000 |
8 |
50 |
23 |
0.31 |