Wear factor (K) is an indication of a materials resistance to wear as a function of the volume of material lost, force (load) and velocity at the wear interface and time. It is often determined using a “thrust washer” wear testing apparatus per ASTM D3702 in which a molded plastic specimen is rotated against a substrate thrust washer under set pressure and velocity conditions.

A wear factor is calculated with the equation W=K*F*V*T. In this equation W is wear volume (mm3), K is wear factor (mm3/N m)10-8, F is force (N), V is velocity (m/sec), and T is elapsed time (sec).

A material with a lower wear factor (K) has greater resistance to wear and these values are useful for material comparison purposes.

[ View nylon 6/6 wear data in english units | Return to wear data resin system list ]

Plastic vs Plastic

Test Conditions

PV 35

Load 0.90

Speed 0.25

Rotating Sample vs Stationary Sample µ
Dynamic
RTP Product Wear

Factor

RTP Product Wear

Factor

PA 6/6

Unfilled

172 vs

PA 6/6

Unfilled

161 0.11

PA 6/6

Unfilled

741 vs

POM

Unfilled

191 0.38

PA 6/6

Unfilled

236 vs

POM

PFPE Lubricated

PTFE Lubricated

26 0.29

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

128 vs

PC

30% Glass Fiber

83 0.09

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

206 vs

PC

30% Glass Fiber

66 0.10

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

59 vs

PA 6/6

15% PTFE

30% Glass Fiber

57 0.09

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

201 vs

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

22 0.13

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

83 vs

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

78 0.16

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

235 vs

PC

15% PTFE

96 0.19

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

63 vs

POM

20% PTFE

32 0.30

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

57 vs

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

146 0.27

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

111 vs

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

15% PTFE

102 0.25

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

1796 vs

PC

30% Glass Fiber

1971 0.26

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

649 vs RTP 805 CC

POM

30% Glass Fiber

Chemically Coupled

1757 0.41

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

49 vs

POM

20% PTFE

24 .013

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

15% PTFE

16 vs

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

15% PTFE

16 0.10

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

15% PTFE

45 vs

PA 6/6

20% PTFE

201 0.19

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

15% PTFE

12 vs

POM

20% PTFE

32 0.10

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

15% PTFE

86 vs

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

15% PTFE

236 0.15

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

295 vs

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

309 0.34

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

106 vs

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

15% PTFE

84 0.25

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

241 vs RTP 285 TFE 15 SI 2

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

15% PTFE

2% Silicone

352 0.25

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

15% PTFE

102 vs

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

15% PTFE

16 0.18

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

15% PTFE

231 vs

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

15% PTFE

216 0.27

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

15% PTFE

129 vs

PA 6/6

30% Glass Fiber

159 0.21

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

13% PTFE

2% Silicone

271 vs

PA 6/6

30% Carbon Fiber

13% PTFE

2% Silicone

204 0.21

PA 6/6

PFPE Lubricated

PTFE Lubricated

105 vs

POM

20% PTFE

28 0.30

PA 6/6

PFPE Lubricated

PTFE Lubricated

68 vs

POM

PFPE Lubricated

PTFE Lubricated

109 0.22

PA 6/6

PFPE Lubricated

PTFE Lubricated

215 vs

POM

PTFE Lubricated

Silicone Lubricated

UL94 HB

43 0.06
  • Thrust washer testing conducted per ASTM D 3702
  • Wear Factor: (mm3/N m)10-8
  • PV: KPa m/sec
  • Load: N
  • Speed: m/sec

Plastic vs Steel

RTP Product Tested vs. Steel (1018 C)
PV 70

Load 1.80

Speed 0.25

PV 175

Load 2.25

Speed 0.50

PV 350

Load 9.00

Speed 0.25

Wear
Factor
µ
Dynamic
Wear
Factor
µ
Dynamic
Wear
Factor
µ
Dynamic

Unfilled PA 6/6

1811 0.66 191 0.91 384 0.60

2% Silicone

1284 0.54 364 0.78 171 0.77

10% PTFE

685 0.41 342 0.41 314 0.29

20% PTFE

193 0.27 22 0.18

18% PTFE

2% Silicone

22 0.20 119 0.36 36 0.19

30% Glass Fiber

15% PTFE

84 0.50 199 0.77 261 0.42

30% Carbon Fiber

15% PTFE

72 0.35 107 0.31 169 0.59

15% Aramid Fiber

15% PTFE

225 0.39 64 0.44 298 0.39

PFPE Lubricated

PTFE Lubricated

34 0.44 88 0.39 181 0.27
  • Thrust washer testing conducted per ASTM D 3702
  • Wear Factor: (mm3/N m)10-8
  • PV: KPa m/sec
  • Load: N
  • Speed: m/sec

Comparing competitive data note

RTP Company reports Wear Factors per unit Force (KF) with units of (mm3/N m)10-8. This is the industry standard way to calculate and report Wear Factor. Some suppliers report Wear Factors per unit Pressure (KP) with units of (mm3/Pa m)10-11. This value is arrived at by dividing the KF by the contact surface of the test specimen 0.00023 or 2.3-4 m2. As result of this reporting discrepency, RTP Company’s Wear Factor values appear to be significantly higher. For example a KP of 3 (mm3/Pa m)10-11 would be equal to KF of 3/0.00023 = 13 (mm3/N m)10-8.

No information supplied by RTP Company constitutes a warranty regarding product performance or use. Any information regarding performance or use is only offered as suggestion for investigation for use, based upon RTP Company or other customer experience. RTP Company makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the suitability or fitness of any of its products for any particular purpose. It is the responsibility of the customer to determine that the product is safe, lawful and technically suitable for the intended use. The disclosure of information herein is not a license to operate under, or a recommendation to infringe any patents.